The best way to protect the environment is to use local resource, such as food or building materials rather than transporting resources from other places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of protection of the environment through the home resources instead of importing from various foreign nations. To some extent I am after with the given notion and this essay will discuss further with logical explanations.
On the one hand, there are plethora of products and equipments that require huge investments to produce or create on local level. There are many countries those have their unique natural resources and to utilise these materials the import is the only option left for the other countries which are unable to produce these products. For instance, Arab countries have their own unique natural product such as oil and rest of the countries can only take the advantage of particular things as an import. Furthermore, import and export are the primary methods to build strong connections among countries.
On the other hand, protection of the environment requires ample of preventions, one of them is use of local resources and products. Moreover, there are enormous of merits of home grown products and equipments, the most preponderant one is that it will create employment opportunities and will encourage the local companies and factories to produce the essential equipments and materials for the local community. For example, Aasam is famous for tea production in India and by the use of these natural products the economy must grow in term of local production. Hence, there are several other products as well as goods that can be used to enhance the local markets.
To conclude, Environmental protection depends on various factors that needs to be addressed including the use of local resources, whereas, there should be decline in the import of unnecessary goods from the other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-29 | jotdhillon1510 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | jotdhillon1510 | 73 | view |
- Increased people s life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start to work at young age Is this alternative a positive or negative development 73
- The best way to protect the environment is to use local resource such as food or building materials rather than transporting resources from other places To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Some people think that news and media are affecting our life in a positive way while others disagree What is your opinion 84
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declined'?
Suggestion: declined
...cal resources, whereas, there should be decline in the import of unnecessary goods from...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21254355401 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82758570657 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3564343909 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199681480807 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079628301043 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628682695234 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117088831627 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324059222586 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.