The best way to reduce crime among young people is to teach parents good parenting skills. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Give your own opinion and examples.
The standard rate of increase in criminology has taken a society a step backward. In correspondence to this, parents are criticized for the act. Provided, if the parents are inclined with parental ability there are chances of reduction in the crime which I strongly disagree.
The state of strict rules of government can lead to the deplete of the crime, where parents cannot be incriminated. It is government's role to harden the punishments for the crime by making them understand the consequences earlier. For example, over a period children are raped and killed. "Asifa" six-year-old girl had been brutally raped and murdered, it took almost a year to declare a judgement. Soon a three-year child fall in place, if the law was precise and frantic the second crime wouldn't be positioned.
In addition, schools should give more by imparting knowledge on disciplines. Being a youngster, everyone’s characteristics are developed in school and it is the tutor’s responsibility to scale up the behavioral attributes. Say like, if a student had stolen a pencil of a fellow student, it is the master’s duty to make the kid understand the mistake, therefore it is not repeated. Although the governments and schools plays a role, after parents behavior and their contribution in bringing up a child by teaching them the culture and values there would be a fall in crime.
In conclusion, the act of being disciplined is in the hands of the surroundings. Being it a governments rule or a school’s value or parental skills, one should be agitated to do a crime. As a result, this can be ended up by high rise in punishments and not by parental ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... strict rules of government can lead to the deplete of the crime, where parents cannot be i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'child'?
Suggestion: child
...ces earlier. For example, over a period children are raped and killed. 'Asifa'...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...as precise and frantic the second crime wouldnt be positioned. In addition, schools ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05035971223 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31010313664 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7235921748 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153508269001 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555763441911 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607937963243 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107930684754 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531587233151 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.