Both the poor and rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree?
Admissions to universities are getting increasingly difficult irrespective of the stature. I agree to the argument that both rich and poor parents find it challenging for their children to get admissions into universities. This essay will outline my reasoning for supporting this view.
Firstly, the biggest contributing factor, is the growth of average intellect amongst today’s children. Most of the current generation, are more intelligent and sharper than their previous generation; this not only creates intense competition amongst them, but also reduces the opportunities for many average students. For example, a renowned university increases its admission marks threshold each year since most of the students are scoring above average marks in their entrance exams as compared to earlier times when most of them scored average marks. Thus, despite being rich or poor, children have to constantly keep themselves ahead of competition to get admissions.
One more factor that brings equality is the intensity and toughness of entrance exams. Entrance exams are key source of testing student’s aptitude and also critical to get into universities. Either rich or poor, students have to clear entrance exams to be admitted to universities. To support this point, in the year 2012 the level of difficulty for IIT entrances increased by 30% as compared to 2011. Thus larger pool of students found it difficult to meet the cut offs for admissions.
To conclude, complexities to get admissions in most of the universities are rising, and impacts not only poor but also rich. In my opinion, with increase in level of intellect abilities and toughness of entrance exams, only the brilliant brains from any stature shall stand chance for admissions to universities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 78 | view |
2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
2019-11-23 | rakeshsharma.msbi | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s increased by 30% as compared to 2011. Thus larger pool of students found it diffic...
^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chance for admissions to universities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45289855072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00888509568 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.609341204 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148251477448 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609748468948 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801928852737 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10766812691 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076154098616 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.