In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In developed nations, such as Britain, senior citizens often move to old-age home where they can get better medical assistance. For which, the government often supply funds to run this place. In my opinion, it should be a joint responsibility to supply funds as the old citizens are equal part of both society as well as family.
To begin with, the prime responsibility to look after old people of the family is of family. If some families are incapable to take care of their retired people and choose to send them to a retirement home for whatever reasons, they should at least provide financial support. After all, they have sacrificed their whole life for the betterment of the next generations who should return the favor by providing aid. Besides, places like this needs enormous funds because of continuous medical emergencies and government alone is not capable to supply all the funds. Thus, families’ financial involvement to run such places is more essential.
However, the senior citizens are still part of a society as well nation and the authorities cannot afford to overlook one whole section of its citizens. Not only they have served the country directly or indirectly but some of them are still active part of the communities which means they deserve a proper care. Besides, the government has more resources, which they can effectively utilize to run old-age homes, compared to individual families. Hence, even government support is indispensable.
The most effective solution would be to incorporate more pension scheme by authorities so that these people can take care of themselves instead of seeking other people’s involvement. In India, for instance, pension plans which are run by the government are so strong that nobody has to worry about their old age.
In Conclusion, senior citizens are equal and essential part of family and community. Thus, it is combined responsibility of both to look after them rather than arguing on who should honor their duties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Wajeeha Umer | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The cultures of many countries around the world becomes more similar than they used to be What are the reasons for this trend Is it positive or negative 42
- You travelled by a long distance bus recently and your suitcase was damaged.Write a letter to the bus company. In your letter• Inform the bus company of when and to where you travelled.• Describe your suitcase and what happened to it.• Explain why t 89
- Some people think that new technologies benefits the life of workers whereas some deny the statement Discuss both sides and give your opinion 86
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online Is this a positive or a negative development Provide relevant examples from you own experience 92
- You are invited to the former classmates’ party organized by one of the classmates. Write a letter to the host about the following:-Tell that you like to participate in organization of the party-Share about something relevant that is happening in your l 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...citizens are equal part of both society as well as family. To begin with, the prime res...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, so, still, thus, well, after all, as to, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15644171779 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80318591164 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.082794728 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32428453997 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100862067708 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595394776569 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169814006314 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632849332255 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.