Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that countries following extended working hours are economically more developed and prosperous than those with comparatively short working hours. However, this essay strongly disagrees with this viewpoint. Firstly, this essay will discuss the fact of how it is a mere myth and instead, the health of workers is compromised and, secondly, discuss how the decline in birth rate with this phenomenon affects the overall economy of the country.
Productivity and health of citizens play a vital role in the economy of any nation. People often sacrifice their health by working for more than 48 hours per week. This tendency, when adopted regularly, becomes a routine and as a result, the stress level is increased. Therefore, the productivity of workers gets affected, which is directly proportional to the overall development of a country. Asian countries are a prime example of this where long working hours are very common and at the same time these countries If compared with their counterpart European countries following short working hours, then Asian countries are considered to be less efficient and advanced.
Working people spend less time with their family or choose to be single due to increased job timings and work commitments, which leads to a low birth rate. Reduction in birth rate affects the economy of any country because of the skill gap. When older people retire from their jobs, there are less younger people available to replace them. In other words, less tax revenue would be generated by the income of fewer workers. This would force the government to cut benefits, increase the tax on income and borrow money from other countries. For instance, South Korea is a major example of this trend where childbirth rate has decreased substantially in the last few decades and the government of South Korea has enforced the fixed working hours per week in 2018 to promote birth rate in a country.
To recapitulate, this essay discords with the idea of measuring the economic growth of any nation with the system where employees work for more than fixed hours per week. This is because of the aforementioned facts that how reduced well-being of the inhabitants and low immortality rate affects the overall development of any country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | jaskaranvir2k15 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | Ell | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-02 | ravishkazi | 93 | view |
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 84
- You missed to attend friends invite Write a letter to your friend apologia for not coming explain how did you try to contact him her what is the alternate plan 82
- You are interested in attending a short course at a college in an English speaking country Write a letter to the college administration In the letter you should tell what course you would like to attend give details about your educational background and w 89
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. in your letter- say where you think you left the papers- explain why they are so imp 70
- Many people these days have computer laptops telephones at their home for work Do you think working from home has more advantages or disadvantages Give reasons 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less young'?
Suggestion: less young
...eople retire from their jobs, there are less younger people available to replace them. In ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11827956989 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68870962367 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502688172043 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7900455317 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233184995405 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742803832684 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945653197929 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152029000255 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539134353781 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.