Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is thought by some people that talented people, such as composers, producers, painters should not be limited in freedom of their own thoughts. There are a lot of examples from real life when particular movie or song incurred by critics from authorities or common people. As a result, inventor coerced to make some changes to the final product. I can’t totally agree with this such outcomes of the criticism and in this essay I will weight all pros and cons of this situation.
It is indisputable argument that the main idea of a releasing product should be guided by an author itself. The movie’s producer knows better what sort of footage he wants to get; what sort of ideas he wants to pass to the audience. The same situation happens in music industry. More than 50 years ago, the unknown young band “The Beatles” have been trying to find an appropriate label to release their first album for a couple of months. Their proposition was rejected by different labels’ managers more than 5 times! They thought this music is nonsense and wouldn’t get a popularity among youth. As a result, “The Beatles” finally found who could release their album and became one of the most popular bands in entire music’s history.
However, sometimes third persons’ corrections could be useful too. Contemporary inventors tend to obtain glory or fame at any costs and try to create something to conger people’s attention. Among such inventions we could find something that could bring a harm to the children or humiliate sexuality minority’s group. In result, particular words, paintings or movies can bring a harm to our society.
To give a clear example, one of the most popular USSR’s movies, which called “A Diamond Hand” have been rerecorded more than two times due a lots of corrections by governments of that time. As a result, this movie became the best one of that time and it still very actual nowadays.
In conclusion, the main thought of releasing product should be created be the inventor or author. But sometimes, some corrections are mandatory to avoid unrests among the population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | Humayan Kabir | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | kushal kushal | 73 | view |
| 2016-09-26 | max1991 | 84 | view |
| 2016-08-20 | rahipatel3011 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 84
- Intelligence is most important component for leadership Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and support it with adequate examples 70
- Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in t 67
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for you kitchen but it did not work. You phoned the shop but no action was taken.Write a letter to the shop manager. In your letter:describe the problem with the equipment.explain what happened when you phoned the 84
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...movies can bring a harm to our society. To give a clear example, one of the most...
^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...been rerecorded more than two times due a lots of corrections by governments of that t...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'in conclusion', 'sort of', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264900662252 0.247107183377 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.130242825607 0.155533422707 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.083885209713 0.0946595960268 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0309050772627 0.0501214627716 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0353200883002 0.0437548338989 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0927152317881 0.122226691241 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0286975717439 0.0403226058552 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89474137119 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0331125827815 0.0326793684256 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0927152317881 0.0861772015684 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0220750551876 0.021408717616 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0176600441501 0.011925033212 148% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2225.0 1933.35771543 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 316.048096192 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07923497268 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357923497268 0.374742101984 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286885245902 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196721311475 0.203846283523 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144808743169 0.137316102897 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89474137119 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.037074148 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.56093040696 106% => OK
Word variations: 70.1527578692 60.7387585426 115% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0498399485 49.517814964 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 127.492653851 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.814263465372 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 46.9885245902 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.96629213483 1.69124875643 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21856513792 0.332605444948 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.071778984573 0.102741220458 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0569259653654 0.0668466124924 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520361511029 0.534860350844 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.187663317184 0.148594505496 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820721624942 0.134430193775 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052577184286 0.0742795772207 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.194362986901 0.324371583561 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.065857273979 0.0638462369009 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131297232607 0.228012699653 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576634115381 0.058150111329 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.