Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether technological advancement should be simplified to preserve the environment or ought to be employed to cope with problems. Admittedly, both views are reasonable with its merits; however, I tend to be convinced by the latter idea, considering that it alternates non-renewable energy, in addition to addressing green issues.
Rationally, people who opt for less sophisticated technology typically assume that it will reduce energy consumption. To put it simply, assuming that dwellers restrict the overuse of high-tech equipment, which consumes a large amount of electricity, they will subsequently develop a more environmentally-friendly lifestyle without a doubt. A salient example can be seen with greenhouse gases emissions that stem from household appliances such as air-conditioners, water heaters, televisions, and the like. In addition, chemical substances such as fertilisers and compost, which are rather convenient and effortless to stimulate plants, will contaminate and pollute not only soil but also water and air, thereby undermining residents’ health and well-being.
Conversely, a reason which convinces me to reject the former idea is that technological innovation is rather pivotal to address green issues. People now can generate electricity from alternative resources, which inaugurates the era of renewable energy. Conceding that solar energy, wind and wave energy were developed, it would be rather simple to halt the electricity produced from non-renewable energy, including coal and fuel. In addition, applying scientific innovations on manufacturing processes can diminish irreversible damage To clarify, purifiers and waste treatment systems can tackle water pollution.
In conclusion, people have rationale to claim that there will be less environmental deterioration if there is less complex advancement in science and technology. Despite this, I still support the opinion that it can resolve problems since it is more advantageous and aims for the long-run betterment.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings Discuss both views and gi 78
- Some people think that language should be taught in small classes while other people think the number of students in a language class does not matter Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 89
- Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination while others think that there are more important factors such as money and appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether technological advancement should be sim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, so, still, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91496598639 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4529371892 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659863945578 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.818599088 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.916666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164602891785 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558702709964 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419516501125 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970715576537 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458590794016 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.