Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The governments generally have limited fundings and yet a lot of issues to deal with. So, to be effective, they should prioritize the issues which are most vital for them and for the residents of their country. Some think that the government should invest more money in arts, and some other belive that funding Olympic teams should be in priority. I also agree with the second group due to a number of reasons which I am going to discuss.
First, Olympic is the most important sporting event in the world, with thousands of participants from all countries and billions of viewers from all over the world. Good performance of the athletes in these games would attract the attention of people to the country. Also, some international sponsors could be attracted so that they would start investing in the teams.These sponsors provide money and more money means having access to better facilities and better coaches which, can guarantee future success as well. Also, there is a chance that some of the athletes could be transferred into a well-known club and become an international star and an iconic representation of the country.
Secondly, the member of these successful teams could become role models for the people, especially the young generation, provide them an enthusiasm to start playing sports. This can lead the society to be healthier and happier, in a long run.
Thirdly, these sporting events can be a reason for people to gather together to watch the games together, whether in a park or a bar or in each others house. For example,for the tennis finals of the games, hunderds of people in my city gathered together to watch the match in the central park. This can bring people joy even if it is just for a few days.
All in all, I think that investing on Olympic teams would be a more effective investment for the governments since success in these popular games can attract attention, provide joy and healthiness to people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...they would start investing in the teams.These sponsors provide money and more money m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s as well. Also, there is a chance that some of the athletes could be transferred into a we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , for
...bar or in each others house. For example,for the tennis finals of the games, hunderd...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86144578313 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64339793072 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0231502628 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104316924049 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380096982523 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382174721738 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563243934115 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497355863999 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.