dsjdsdsad
Nowadays, social interaction and communication between individuals are drastically improved due to the significance of the internet and the latest mobile phones. This essay believes that the positive side of the new mode of communicating is time-saving and effective which far outweighs the negative sides of lack of face to face conversation reducing bonding between people.
To begin with, the prime upside of this new invention is improving the way of communication compared to a past life. Indeed our grandparents have to wait for a long time to receive their messages in the form of letters, however with the growth of internet facilities, we can send and receive our message in a short time period of time via e-mail and text services. For instance, with the latest gadgets, it is easier for people to keep in touch with their relatives because it is handy and charges less with many social media applications such as WhatsApp and Facebook. Besides this, we can make video calling to our near and dear ones who are living at a far distance with less cost and give us feelings of meeting face to face and this technology has improved the way of communication which is the biggest advantage.
Many old people believe this trend is a negative development for society because these devices have made people lazier and diminish the chance of meeting their relatives face to face, especially on traditional occasions. Because of this, their relation and understanding decreasing gradually and makes them selfish. For example, In India, nowadays people wish each other via mobile phones rather than meeting personally. Despite it saves time, it decreases people's faith in their relatives.
In conclusion, I believe it has more positive sides as it saves our time which far outweighs its negative side of decreasing chance of personal meetings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-22 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- uuuu 11
- Should old people live with the family or separately with same aged people Discuss both the views 67
- Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- ddddd 11
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...To begin with, the prime upside of this new invention is improving the way of communication c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... communication compared to a past life. Indeed our grandparents have to wait for a lon...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...and receive our message in a short time period of time via e-mail and text services. For insta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11221122112 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8146262496 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551155115512 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0396159125 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.818181818 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.