Essay Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Essay Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

Most individuals are of the view of that social networking websites like Facebook are tremendously detrimental to the people and the community. In my opinion, I believe that besides the negative impacts of these websites they can be beneficial in some cases also.

Using social networking platforms can harm an individual in more than one ways. People, at present, spend too much time surfing these sites and are unable to apply themselves to what is more important, such as work and studies. As a result, the overall productivity of an individual is afflicted which eventually, more often than not, leads to lower job prospects at workplaces and poor grades in academics.

Social media platforms can have negative impacts on the society as a whole as well. Social media users of a community are much less concerned about their surroundings and people around them who might be in an immediate need of help. They are living in their own social circle which creates a sense of deprivation among other members of the community. Moreover, these networking sites are often exploited by some extremists who actively launch anti-state campaigns. These are the biggest sources of spreading social unrest within a community.

Finally, in my view, these platforms can also be used for the betterment of an individual and the society as a whole. Leading news agencies are linked with these networking sites and users can stay updates of latest news and political developments around the globe. Additionally, as a whole, social activists can start social groups on these websites which are oriented towards the welfare of state and its dwellers. As an example, there are active Facebook groups which aim at the settlement and well-being of new immigrants in Canada.

In conclusion, apart from negative effects of social networking platforms, they can also be used constructively for individuals and whole communities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-12 Sumair Aslam 73 view
2019-11-06 Lavanyakanumuri 73 view
2019-08-04 elveslord77 78 view
2019-05-14 ieltsietls 73 view
2019-02-25 Richa Dhiman 61 view
Essays by user Sumair Aslam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...es they can be beneficial in some cases also. Using social networking platforms...
^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one way', 'a way', or simply 'ways'?
Suggestion: one way; a way; ways
...rms can harm an individual in more than one ways. People, at present, spend too much tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 207, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...orking sites and users can stay updates of latest news and political developments around ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, moreover, so, well, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, in some cases, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2427184466 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85832893524 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537216828479 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9855136232 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189960578417 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716338352481 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463163131128 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119853315228 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377395302405 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.