Essay topics:
The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates data about the percentage of hired people in the UK economy, namely public sector, private sector and self-employed, over a decade period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the employment rate in the private sector witnessed a significant downward trend, while there were upward trends in the public and self-employed sector over the period in question.
Looking at the details, as regards the private sector, the percentage started at under 50% in 2000. After that, there was a remarkable decline to approximately 8% in 2002, before levelling off in the following year. At this point, the employment rate halved in the period between 2003 and 2009 and then the figure hit the trough of 20% in the last year.
With respect to the self-employed sector, the proportion remained stable over the first three years. Despite a considerable decrease from nearly 38% in 2003 to just under 50% in 2005, the figure then reduced gradually by 5% in 2006. Subsequently, there was a steady increase, finishing at well over 50%. Regarding the self-employed sector, the trend was similar. The employment rate climbed slightly between 2000 and 2002, before dropping to the same rate in the beginning. Following this, there was a substantial rise to 30% in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | hongtran268 | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 73
- Essay topics The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Essay topics The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, then, well, while, as regards, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04128440367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76527900018 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8592979127 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9090909091 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173667267648 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664450355501 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575064560011 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117555194958 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323573240798 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.