Essay topics: News stories on TV and in newspaper are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this.

Articles in the Internet and stories from book are frequently accompanied with pictures. Indeed pictures provide a vivid vision of information, which implies that picture is more effective than word in expression. However, I think that picture is just a complementary to words and words are the main source to convey information.

To start with, picture tenders a vivid description. A picture proffers a detailed image of what descripted in an article or a story. For example, a sketch in story can show background, people and event in a scene from a perspective. Nonetheless, a serial of pictures without description in word transmit no fixed meaning, which is subjected to views's interpretation. Therefore, picture is merely a complementary to words.

Words are the main source to convey information. A title in an article indicates what is the topic. Introduction paragraph introduces the background of the article and body paragraphs expound details of it. A whole article conveies the specific and detailed information of an event, an idea or a report. Definitely a picture compliments the expression of words. Nevertheless, words can transmit meaning accurately without a picture attached to it. Thus, words are the main source to convey information.

In conclusion, words are more effective in expression than picture. Picture is only s complementary to words, eventhough it reveals a vivid image of the content. However, words are the dominant conveyer of information because picture expresses no stationary meaning without a description in words.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...e frequently accompanied with pictures. Indeed pictures provide a vivid vision of info...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43032786885 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26213804301 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495901639344 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7321066164 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6111111111 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5555555556 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162744208747 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606776422987 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479775731835 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118166091238 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427167864372 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.