In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of
old people than younger people in many countries.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from
your own knowledge or experience.
Eldery people are living longer today and their percentage is exceeding younger people by a high number in different countries around the world. While some people view this as a negative trend, I see it as positive sign for development economicaly and socialy.
The high number of old generation over the younger one will benefit the country in several ways. The most important advantage that old people have over the young is the experience. They have been living for a while so their experience in work is very rich. Thus, they can share this experience with the youngers. Valuable lessons will be taught to the young so they can avoid mistakes and save time. For example, I have personally benefited from my grandfather who showed me how to save an endangered plant. Without his knowledge that accumulated over the years, the plant could have not been saved.
Another benefit for having old people more than young people is socialisation. Eldery will bring all the family together and keep them united. This is so true among eastern society. In the Arab world, people pay so much respect to older people's opinion and obey them. This is so benefitial in troubles as eldery people could easily solve problems and end any fighting with wisdom. Therefore, the presence of older people is vital in special events where conflicts may occur.
To conclude, it is positive to have old people more than young people for the development of any country. They can help in saving time and efforts through sharing their knowledge and experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | fadiin | 56 | view |
- On a recent holiday, you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you havetravel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In yourletter:• describe the item you lost• explain how you lost it• tel 73
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion ofold people than younger people in many countries.Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fromyour own knowledge or expe 56
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94230769231 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48361196695 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8758322017 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5882352941 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246607853453 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829557304443 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696231180496 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176483961158 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520773819427 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.