There is no shortage of debate about whether the land is used for human needs of to save the endanger animals. In my opinion, I firmly believe that it is worthwhile to use land for the people in the Earth rather than to use for saving endanger animals. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, we know human beings are the most important creature in the Earth because without human beings it is very hard for nature to exist. They play vital role in balancing the environment. For example, in my village people have used land for the farming which helps them to produce food. They have also built houses for their settlement. In addition, they constructed factories for the preparing food from the raw material. As a result, Environment of our society is pleasant and balanced. Secondly, it is not necessary for the human beings to teach to save the animals. People have knowledge and they have the sense to protect the animals which are rare in the Earth. My own experience is compelling example of this. I am so emotional that I have feelings towards animals. I love animals at home to which I love most. To save animals lives at first I have to exist in the nature. I uses land for the different purpose; however, I have also thought about the animal which are going to be extinct. So I have dog at home. I am conscious about the animal life. I cook food and feed them. I feel that like human beings, animal has also right to live in the Earth. This example illustrates that Human beings has sense of humor to save all the animals which are found in the Earth. Finally, people can use land in proper way; they know the value of all the creature in the nature. Moreover, people in the Earth play major role to save the animals. People can put certain land for the lives of the animals. For instance, in my village people uses certain part of land for their personal purpose and remaining parts of land is used for saving endanger animals. People can figure out the land which is useful to the animals. There is one land which has environment suitable for the adaption for tiger; people do not use that land for their personal interest. This shows that all the land cannot be used by the people. To sum up, the evidences that i mentions in the above passages are strong enough to convince the statement that I agree with. This is because human beings know the value of animals, which part of the land is suitable for the adaption of animals, and are more emotional to the animals. These are the reasons which are convincing with the statement.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that Living of today is more comfortable than that of our grandparents in children give specific examples and details to support you ideas 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...land is used for human needs of to save the endanger animals. In my opinion, I firmly believ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 895, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: saving
...necessary for the human beings to teach to save the animals. People have knowledge and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1228, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... first I have to exist in the nature. I uses land for the different purpose; however...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1352, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'dogged'.
Suggestion: dogged
...hich are going to be extinct. So I have dog at home. I am conscious about the anima...
^^^
Line 1, column 1430, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...animal life. I cook food and feed them. I feel that like human beings, animal has...
^
Line 1, column 2286, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'i' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...people. To sum up, the evidences that i mentions in the above passages are strong enough...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 475.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47578947368 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30261708266 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408421052632 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 5.43587174349 368% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 16.0721442886 193% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5219117392 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.5806451613 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3225806452 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61290322581 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 8.67935871743 253% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758441724564 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265715208059 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032567039091 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758441724564 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.0946893788 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.11 12.4159519038 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.