Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries. To what extend do you agree and disagree?
In various nations, children are receiving extra cash to spend on their needs. I agree with this statement as this is beneficial for children; however, parents should be aware about their spending.
To begin with, pocket money creates great benefits on different levels. Firstly, it provides each child opportunities to maintain funds at an earlier age. That is to say, if children are getting daily extra cash in order to buy academic items and other things, obviously, they will learn through this how to manage this money appropriately so that they can fulfill their entire needs. Secondly, When children have extra money, they can save this money for future use. To exemplify, It is found in a college research that some students invest in their business from saving their daily pocket-money. Thus, pocket money can help in younger age when they need more money to make a successful career.
However, despite having various positive outputs of pocket money, parents ought to be knowledgeable about where they are spending this money. This is mainly due to the fact that some time children might buy those things which can be detrimental for them such as drugs, alcohol and expensive gadgets. If they indulge in any bad activities one time,undoubtedly, they will repeat due to habit. As a result, they can commit crimes in order to complete their requirements,and it will ruin their career because they need more money than pocket cash.
To conclude, although extra cash can help children in further life, and they learn finance management, this money usage must be under the parents' knowledge so that children do not involve in any anti-social activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-06 | novexam | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-06 | novexam | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-06 | novexam | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | sahilrocks11 | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | Jibon Domingo Gomes | 84 | view |
- Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries Discuss both advantages and disadvantages and what your opinion is 61
- Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries To what extend do you agree and disagree 61
- Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries To what extend do you agree and disagree 61
- Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries To what extend do you agree and disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... various nations, children are receiving extra cash to spend on their needs. I ag...
^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , undoubtedly
...y indulge in any bad activities one time,undoubtedly, they will repeat due to habit. As a re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... in order to complete their requirements,and it will ruin their career because they ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to finance'
Suggestion: to finance
...hildren in further life, and they learn finance management, this money usage must be un...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...ent, this money usage must be under the parents knowledge so that children do not invol...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, such as, as a result, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09854014599 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63079961456 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.805182592 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149955665078 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655996816671 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038411261351 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10184011481 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241008376713 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.