The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree

Education plays an important role to catapult country's growth forward. A recent controversy revolves around the question of the most essential subject that contributes to country's progress, people interestingly dispute whether only science or other subjects should hold this position. This essay will explore constructive arguments to showcase that along with science other subjects are equally significant for development.

Development is measured not only in terms of technology but also in the form of sports. A fully developed nation have the best athletes for which sports education is required. For instance, if a child is inclined towards only science, it will alleviate his playing skill. Additionally, English or any other national language is utmost important for communication. The nation will fail to demonstrate its progress if it is not communicated adequately by leaders. For instance, engineers and scientists needs to display and tell other people of their invention which is impossible if they haven't learnt to communicate.

Another known positive aspect that warrants favoring other subjects is that even science require a great deal of support of other subjects. Mathematics, for instance, is undoubtedly needed to solve the problems of physics. If a person cannot play with numbers, he will not be able to excel in science. History, an other crucial subject, is useful to understand country's past growth and the mistakes so that it won't be repeated in near future. For instance, satellite was not launched in winters as it was a flop show due to decreased temperature.

By and large, science hold the top position when it comes to development but other subjects cannot be underestimated. Excelling in one subject and discarding the others will not help in anything and therefore, all subjects should be respected.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...r invention which is impossible if they havent learnt to communicate. Another known...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...t be able to excel in science. History, an other crucial subject, is useful to understan...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for instance, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40277777778 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98749967715 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7228918202 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246499375717 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773522871119 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500945572874 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15908519011 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379871794442 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.