Government should put tax on unhealthy food to promote better health Do you agree or disagree
In the contemporary era, culinary choices of people have been altered surreally because of which fast food has taken over the world. Most of these foods leave a grim effect on the physical condition of consumers. Because of this, I entirely agree with the idealogy of taxation of unhealthy food.
Firstly, one of the primary reasons why people are fascinated about this is its availability at a relatively affordable price. So, people are hugely into it. This has generated an alarming situation where the authorities have to intervene and pass admonitions regarding the hygienic condition of its citizens. So, tariffing them increases their respective prices thus mostly nullifying the people's interest. On the other hand, this also shore up the economy.
Unhygienic nature has been the major factor contributing to the outbreak of hereditary epidemics. As an example, let us consider obesity which has been a major issue among all age groups. On this basis, it is obvious that this junk food culture must be brought to a halt. Imposing a tax not only protects the health of the public but can also be used to take up remedial measures to curb obesity. Thus diminishing the ghastly influences of unedible items out there.
In light of the fact that unhealthy eatables are proven to be devastating, tariffing them will be a great move. I hereby conclude that the given idea can be entirely appreciated and must be enforced as soon as possible.
- Scientists believe computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people think the development have a positive impact others think it is negative To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- some people believe that using a bicycle as your main form of transport has a lot of advantages whereas others it has many disadvantages discuss both views and give your opinion 72
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- some people believe that using a bicycle as your main form of transport has a lot of advantages whereas others it has many disadvantages discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, regarding, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02892561983 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73521570606 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652892561983 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8749448942 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1333333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0819318488057 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268060767005 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434515007331 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506040366307 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464153005461 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.