Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that the authority should give more financial support for railway construction rather than road construction. I somewhat agree with this statement because there are various benefits from railways, but using cars also brings about a lot of merits.
On the one hand, the construction of railways may bring certain benefits to the country. The main reason is that trains are eco-friendly to the environment. The train is considered public transportation, which emits a small amount of carbon dioxide than car. For instant, research states that CO2 from car emissions makes up 30% of air pollution while the figure for trains is 9%. Moreover, travelling by train is more convenient than by car. Passengers who use train may not experient the traffic congestion which road passengers suffer.
On the other hand, a country would derive many merits from road construction. First and foremost, by upgrading and building more roads, traffic congestion and accidents would be reduced. To illustrate, VietNam’s authority invested about 1300 billion VND for the construction of the Hanoi - Lao Cai highway, therefore, the number of car accidents in this area showed a drop from 140 cases to 47 cases per year. Another compelling reason is that the more roads are built, the more this area grows. Road extension would lead to the growth in all aspects of life for residents in this area.
In conclusion, I believe that two sides of this statement is justifiable. The authority should treat these problems equally, with a good financial help.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81365184821 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6979184051 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158712089604 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546810274055 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477622435701 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116041786978 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681651718056 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.