Government should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports Do you agree or disagree with this statement

In modern scenario unprecedented technological advancements have modernized the present generation. Numerous intellectual individuals consider that governments should invest huge amounts of money on promoting education rather than amusement and games. In my opinion, recreational activities and games are significant but education plays a pivotal role in betterment and upgradation of the country.

Commencing the discussion, education plays an indispensable role in all round development of an individual. It can be considered as the fundamental requirement from two different perspectives. Firstly, education plays an important role in eradication of illiteracy. Besides, it improves the human living standards and offers a comprehensive outlook on life. Secondly, governments should invest more money on education as it unlocks new horizons and creates numerous employment opportunities. For instance Indian national policy of education offered new educational schemes to benefit the deserving candidates of backward and underprivileged sections of the society.

Further elucidating my perspective. Amusement and sports play an important role to help people stay fit and healthy but still education has more significance. Moreover, games and entertainment depends upon the interest whereas education is an essential requirement. For instance, incurring more money on education would assist government to produce qualified and intellectual professionals. Apart from this, literate individuals would perform more efficiently to uplift the economy of the country.

To recapitulate, education plays an indispensable role in upgradation and technological achievements of the nation. Recreation and sports are important but still education can be considered as the basic necessity of all citizens. Hence, governments should incur more money on providing quality education to the masses rather than wasting on games and entertainment.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...rprivileged sections of the society. Further elucidating my perspective. Amusement a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, apart from, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.3376753507 360% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21933085502 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47987956408 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568773234201 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2222748983 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4117647059 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260805433509 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827080084227 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745315273671 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179657705092 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421921623618 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.41 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.5 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.