It is important that all people, organizations and government cooperate with each other to minimize the destruction of environment. It can be more effective than each person’s action. However, I believe that all people are responsible for our planet and must take responsibility for cutting damage. The following essay will discuss why the governments and big companies’ alignment is more important than individuals action to deter damage from forests, sea and so forth.
Beyond a shadow of doubt, governments and big companies play vital role in environment preservation. By long term planning, they set targets in the level of countries and territories to keep environment for future. Next, they put related strategies to reach these targets. In fact, nobody can push big companies to follow these rules except governments by passing strict lows to restrict harmful environmental activities by industry and put strong tax and impose fine for offenders.
On the other hand, all individuals must take responsibility. Because the environment is for all of us and our future and health depend on its preservation. If the earth had damaged, no future would have been imagined for our children. In fact, government’s target setting is the most important factor, however, without every citizen’s cooperation, nothing would be solved. I believed that they are supplementary of each other. For instance, without great policy, people do not obey rules. Even they do it, the impact of their actions without governmental revision is not effective.
From what has been discussed above, I restate my opinion that impact of governments and big companies planning and commitment to preserve environment and restrict harmful activities is considerably more than individual’s responsibility. In fact all countries must be aligned with each other to pass the same lows and impose punishment to preserve earth for future.
- do you think that breaking the law could ever be the right thing to do Privide your reasons to support your answer
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Nowadays people have adopted an unhealthy lifestyle. Why do think this is? How could this problem be solved? 61
- Do you think that breaking the law could ever be the right thing to do Provide reasons to support your reasons 20
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing Task 1 - Academic 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...nion that impact of governments and big companies planning and commitment to preserve env...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51006711409 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2779996559 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6500257178 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5882352941 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202302103698 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618711940639 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455256449637 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131595565175 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042772649255 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.