Excessive use of sugar is not good for health. Therefore, many governments have imposed special taxes on all eatables that have high levels of sugar. These taxes have some major advantages while there are few disadvantages as well.
Governments have recently imposed taxes on sugary eatables. Excessive use of sugar in our food on daily basis is really bad for our health and it eventually leads to diabetes. Diabetes is a disease that currently has no cure. People who consume a lot of eatables with high levels of sugar on daily basis become diabetics. People having diabetes spend a lot of money on their health care. In order to improve the health of their citizens many governments have imposed special taxes on food that have high level of sugar. Due to sugar taxes, the overall health of the citizens will improve as not many people will be able to buy these expensive foods. By having good health, the citizens don’t have to spend a lot on their health care as they will stay fit by consuming healthy affordable products.
Once overall the health of citizens will improve. Then the government will also benefit from sugar taxes as they will not have to spend a lot on the healthcare infrastructure. The funds saved from the healthcare budget can be spent on different industries towards the prosperity of the country.
These special taxes have some negative impacts as well. Due to these special taxes the prices of high sugary eatables tend to skyrocket. Therefore, poor people are not able to buy these products due to their excessive pricing. Once the prices of these eatables increase. The demand starts to dip as not a lot of people are able to afford these products anymore due to their hefty prices. This directly affects the manufacturers of these products as they start to feel the losses in business due to the decline in demand of these products.
I personally believe that these special taxes are beneficial for all of us. Due to these taxes, more and more people will start to consume healthy eatables that are available at many affordable rates. As a result, the overall health of the population will start to improve in the countries where these taxes have been introduced. More people will stay healthier and fitter.
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 73
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think that it is a good while other think that it has disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks 56
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social and others think that it has made him less social Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that people have the right to university education and government should make it free no matter what their financial background To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...suming healthy affordable products. Once overall the health of citizens will imp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...roducts due to their excessive pricing. Once the prices of these eatables increase. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, then, therefore, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4998215487 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405194805195 0.561755894193 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7928143523 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9166666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0416666667 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290248969932 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103397079043 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969191913106 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189624372927 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998654034457 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.