Across the world, many nations have implemented special taxes on foods and beverages with high sugar levels. While some people support this move, others oppose it. In my opinion, imposing a tax on sugary foods and drinks is a good idea as it improves public health and reduces the burden on public health care systems.
On the one hand, many people support the special taxes on food items containing high levels of sugar mainly because this measure helps to maintain good health. In other words, the imposition of higher taxes reduces the consumption of sugary foods and beverages by increasing their price.
Sugar provides no nutrition and adds just 'empty calories to the human body, contributing to gain weight and disrupting the glucose levels of blood. So, obviously. This measure is in the public interest as it will help individuals keep their health in control and avoid the adverse consequences of a sugar-rich diet, such as diabetes or obesity.
On the other hand, some people opine that the government has no business interfering with people's food choices. After all, adults are capable of choosing what is right and wrong for them. They maintain that if the government deliberately increases tax on sugary foods with the sole objective of making them unaffordable to people, it violates people's rights. However, in my opinion, this argument does not hold much water because it is a well-known fact that sugary foods lead to health problems in people, and as the government spends the most on public health, it has the right to control the consumption. of unhealthy foods.
A lot of people even in developed countries depend entirely on public healthcare programs and hence if they eat whatever they want and end up in hospitals, it does not benefit anyone.
In conclusion, I fully support the argument that the government should increase taxes on sugary drinks and foods to reduce their consumption. These foods are known to cause health problems in people and, as such, their consumption should be controlled.
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favoring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
... the right to control the consumption. of unhealthy foods. A lot of people even...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, well, while, after all, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03869047619 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59635563259 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532738095238 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.313212431 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.866666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282733434589 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923374516235 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864622295116 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14933747965 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111632909249 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.