If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
First of all, the decision will be in the hands of decision makers who work in the company. In other words, there are so many would like to hire staffs with little experience, as they tend to pay fewer salaries instead of high salary, so they think that they could save money from the budget of such company. While other companies prefer to employ in their companies such an experience employees, and they pay a good salary for the employees. So in that light, I will explain in details this issue.
To begin, companies who have well planned strategies that can take in hiring process by fulflling their vacancies with qualified persons in sensitive position, so they will be able to handle any problems which they may encounter while doing their job. Experienced personnel will save the company from devastating as well as they can deal with different complicated problems and solving it easily. Consequently, this kind of employees shall offer a proper suggestion to improve the profits and develop the system alike. For example Microsoft Company, it must hire staff with huge experience in technical and programming backgrounds. As they have to pay an ideal package of salary and offering a perfect enviroment atmosphere to motivate their employees for working hard. As a result, they will constantly make amendments in their system by upgrading it ahead.
On the contrary, there are a large number of companies would decide to hire staff with lower package of salary to save their budgets matters. Hence, they want to have inexperience employees to work in their company. Although, this point is not helpful but it might be successful by providing full a training to their potential personnel for positions for which they hired. Assisting them by the guidance of well experience man for such a position. This view related to companies tactics. There is a good example Carrefour company is specialized about retail business. It has so many vacancies in the positions of shelf fillers. These tasks do not need to get a staff with experience for reflling the shelves, as they only need to increase the stock in the shelves once it is needed to avoid the out of stock cases. In addition, checking the near expiry , and expired item in the warehouse and the selling area too. Furthermore, they report it to the resposible persons for making decision against it.
To sum up, hiring well experience and inexperience teams will help to decrease the prportion of unemployment and it will make a ballance in the community. Notable, employees with lower experience will increase gradually over a period of time, so they can be satisfied and being an asset in the companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-06 | Hussein1987 | 56 | view |
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food and drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 65
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far out weight the disadvantages 80
- Company has advertised a vacancy job at major sport event and this job is unpaid job. And the job will start next month. Why would like to work in this job? Ask the the company something that you need to clear up. 56
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 65
- With the rise in popularity of the Internet, newspapers will soon become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
Comments
Dear test big team,
Dear test big team,
I have recorrected the mistakes, could you check for me , please?!
Your main issues on writing
Your main issues on writing is somehow wordy, look:
Unique words percentage: 0.504444444444 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
try to put less content, but more efficient on the using of words.
----------------------
read essays by other users and see their writing styles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le Microsoft Company, it must hire staff with huge experience in technical and pr...
^^
Line 8, column 28, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ahead. On the contrary, there are a large number of companies would decide to hire staff wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 470, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'company'.
Suggestion: company
...r such a position. This view related to companies tactics. There is a good example Carref...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 853, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. In addition, checking the near expiry , and expired item in the warehouse and t...
^^
Line 11, column 228, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...perience will increase gradually over a period of time, so they can be satisfied and being an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96222222222 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68942607639 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504444444444 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0465660858 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0832431152786 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025909648618 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034904221703 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613860745744 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196792488604 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.