Both Poor and Rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that both the wealthy and the less privileged students have difficulty getting into universities. I do not quite agree with this view. I believe that / in my opinion, children from affluent families can easily get admitted to top universities; however, it is quite difficult for poor students.
To begin with, being born in a rich family is a boon. Rich kids have access to almost everything including a college seat. In every private institution, there are seats reserved for students willing to pay enormous capitation fee. It does not really matter whether they have good grades or not. In other words, even if a student does not excel in academics, they still have the option of getting admission to any course of their choice if they are willing to pay huge admission fee. This is not possible for a student coming from a poor background. Another point to consider is that parents of students coming from rich families have influential contacts. For instance, they are connected to college trustees and raise funds for events. With recommendations from such top people they can easily get admission for their children in any institution of their choice.
On the other hand, young people with no money or influence have to strive hard to get scholarships so that they can continue their studies. If they fail to win a scholarship their dream of pursuing higher education is shattered. Statistics reveal that poor students are more likely to drop out of college than rich students because of their inability to pay the tuition fee.
To recapitulate, it is easier for a child to get admitted to university provided that he has enough money or influence. Conversely, it is quite difficult for students coming from non-affluent families because they have neither money nor people willing to recommend them for a seat.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
- You have borrowed something from your friend, but it was damaged. Write a letter to your friend and say- Apologize for damaging the product- How was it damaged?- What will you do about it? 67
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
- with the help of internet television many people are becoming famous Is this a positive or negative trend Include examples 73
- You have borrowed something from your friend, but it was damaged. Write a letter to your friend and say- Apologize for damaging the product- How was it damaged?- What will you do about it? 64
- The manufacturing and use of cars damage the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this happening How could this be controlled 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Competitive
...ies provide admission on the basis of competitive exams while others take your academic b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but in order to attain a place in there, you have to be talented. Though there ar...
^^^^
Line 21, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , religion
...the basis of wealthiness, poverty, caste,religion, race or gender.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49056603774 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30038712574 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8246654483 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133017182934 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572240198103 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415654842447 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599831666258 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473512740229 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.