With the increased global demand for oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. To what extent do you agree?
Due to the escalating demand for crude oils and gas, it is being suggested to expand the resource exploration to the areas that have never been touched. I disagree with this notion because this approach would not only deteriorate the current environmental condition to a larger extent but also have a severely damaging impact on the earth.
Firstly, digging new places to hunt fossil fuels and gas has become today's norm due to growing requirements. As a result, the environment is losing its natural blend of all the mandatory substances which are required for human survival. In other words, increasing demand has already led scientists to destroy a vast area of green forests, which has resulted in several environmental issues, such as Air-pollution and global warming, to name but few. If further exploration allowed, it would deteriorate the condition and lead to numerous catastrophic events, like earthquakes and landslides.
Another point to consider is that in-order to find more fossil fumes resources, the Government will have to allocate a huge amount of public funds, which i think is worthless. Though this will allow them to generate more fossil fuel and crude oil to fulfil rising demand, however, this public fund can be used on other critical social concerns, such as education and healthcare, and rather than using crude oils and gas, natural energy must be used, solar power and wind are the perfect examples of this development.
In conclusion, exploring different places to produce crude oil and gas to meet the elevating requirement would have a detrimental impact on the environment. Not only this but also it would be a waste administration's fund, which can be utilized for more crucial communicative concerns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-08 | krvchanakya | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-02 | amrita123_ | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | manshu_d | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Jaskaran Kaur | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-21 | harrypottar316 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...te a huge amount of public funds, which i think is worthless. Though this will al...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19858156028 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88659452405 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609929078014 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.079632212 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.6 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194047984806 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728417112834 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619069182437 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121106237964 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346613267048 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.