Industrial pollution is increasing all around the world. Some people say that the most effective way to tackle the problem is to Tax companies that are causing the pollution. Others argue that, there are other ways to control the situation.
This topic provokes great debate amongst people and enterprises due to its importance and impact on the environment. While some argue that high taxation to companies could mitigate the issue, there is a different school of thought which believes that other measures can be taken to address industrial pollution. However, the idea of imposing high taxation could be an effective solution.
Industrial wastes are one of the significant contributors to pollution. Unpurified wastewater, toxic gas, noise and light are contaminating environment all day long. Ordinary people are frequently hesitating to go against because most of the industries are owned by influential individuals, who are backed by the government most of the times. For instance, despite workers boycotts and protests, many companies keep running their factories in developing countries. These factories employ locals, consequently minimising the government's intervention. Therefore, to control this, policymakers should introduce heavy taxation when starting factories and further, they should make filtration mechanisms mandatory before granting approvals for establishment.
On the other hand, to handle such monopolised, and highly economically-impactful issues, there is very less common people could do. Moreover, even police and local authorities are controlled by these powerful enterprises. Bribery and already corrupted systems in most developing nations would not allow people to voice-up. If people take actions against them, there is an absolute risk of them losing jobs. Corrupted politicians are preventing people's actions against such industries. Therefore, without the government's support tackling this issue would be inconceivable.
In conclusion, it would be impossible to handle this issue without hefty tax and policies because other actions which people could take are minimal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | virtualpathum | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | virtualpathum | 56 | view |
- Study shows that many criminals have a low level of education For this reason some people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so that they can get a job when they leave prison Do you agree or disagree 55
- Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped Instead they should spend the money on housing and road development To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people think that economic progress is the only way to measure a country’s success, while others think that there are other factors, which can be used to measure a country’s success. What are these factors? And among them, which one is more impor 78
- Some people say that governments should subsidise fruit and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Others say it is better to tax unhealthy foodDiscuss both these views and give your own opinions. 84
- It’s good to have English as a global language. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o address industrial pollution. However, the idea of imposing high taxation could...
^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...loy locals, consequently minimising the governments intervention. Therefore, to control thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01865671642 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16249559199 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9791614971 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185946714107 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520884453031 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403363315062 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106734781292 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160074103416 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.