Undoubtedly, due to technological advancements, the internet has expanded itself to share the information happening around the world in a fraction of second to educate oneself. I think, not all the content available on the internet is trustworthy. In my perspective, having physical staff who could work to stop the irrelevant stuff posted would reduce the problems to a great extent.
The content available on the internet is acceptable up to certain limit, but, it is undeniable that the information present on the website lacks the important references for which people usually look forward to. To elaborate, these days many people around the globe have rights to edit the content whether they have knowledge about the subject or not, and this ultimately leaves them without any reference. To illustrate this, Wikipedia, one of the most cited sites by many individuals has given access to its users to redraft the content which already exists.
However, these troubles can be encountered by the officials of the technology department. They can play a crucial role in removing the unnecessary information which is posted on different media, either youtube or google or etc. Moreover, strict penalties should be imposed on the individual who is posting the content which is incorrect. For instance, Google, a reputed organization has always had the security questions asked to the writer before submitting the data. Hence, whenever an individual type in any keyword, the details which pop up are authority sites that have been rechecked before posting it online by the staff.
To conclude, although I agree that the internet is reliable to some extent, I believe that the authorized sites have much authenticity of the information.
- people generally know that the environment is important however most individuals still don 039 t take responsibility to protect the environment why is this what should be done to encourage people to protect the environment give reasons for your answe 89
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 89
- Although you have never formally studied computing, you have always been interested in computers. You have just read about a computer course that really.interests you, but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course.Write a letter to the 89
- You’ve recently found an object and you think that it might be of some historical value. Write a letter to the director of the museum asking for some information on the object. - Give a description of that object.- Tell them where you found it.- Ask for 73
- You are attending a night college. You are not happy about a course you are doing. Write a letter to the director. Describe the following:1)What your course is?2)Why are you not happy about it?3)What you want them to do? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, for instance, i think, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28057553957 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89391116057 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2063628623 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202040646701 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687052384316 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597635189101 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115948676142 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520712956276 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.