The internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing?
In recent years communication system has become available by using a web networking system. Distant does not bother, additionally collecting data, using social media are the blessings of modern technology. I strongly believe, although internet has huge positive influcence, it also has some negative impacts too.
Using web networking has made our life more easier. People now only never talk to each other, video call has changed the defination of phone call. Moreover, using massenger, what's up and other net based apps provide the facility of vedio calling. As a result, sitting at opposite side of the earth it seems like just talking sitting infront of some one. Again, data, statistics become available. If someone want to do any research or experiment or want to admit to any unversity, various information are available in web networking world.
These are the one side of available networking system. People use social media where they spread negative or wrong information intentionally that creates social harassment, imbarassment. Suppose, dengu fever becomes epidemic. Some people start sprading wrong information that creates a negative impact on general people. Beside all those things internet has become the source of entertainment. As it is available, cheap people become engaded on them which increase social isolation. Though we are living togather but virtual life destroy our social intimicy.
To sum up, the effect of web base communication system makes our life simple also hampers our social life. To enjoy the benefit of science we people have to be more caucious about the negative impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-22 | balaprasant08 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | balaprasant08 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | umangrdoshi | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | gsw.singh | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | gsw.singh | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
In recent years communication system has become availab...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... Using web networking has made our life more easier. People now only never talk to each oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... phone call. Moreover, using massenger, whats up and other net based apps provide the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ms like just talking sitting infront of some one. Again, data, statistics become availab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...statistics become available. If someone want to do any research or experiment or wan...
^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...act on general people. Beside all those things internet has become the source of enter...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37254901961 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73824354302 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1388203356 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1111111111 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101123559491 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294917844401 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303453487603 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572073171421 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252605600147 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.