The Internet provides us with information about life and cultures of different countries, and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
The Internet provides us with information about the life and cultures of different countries, and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
Nowadays, the advent of new technologies has changed the information environment of human beings, by making updated data from all around the world accessible for everyone. This change makes some experts to suggest that instead of traveling to a new country, an individual could absorb all the information needed, by connecting to the internet. However, I totally disagree with this suggestion, and in this essay, I will explain the reasons behind my opinion.
First of all, traveling could not be completely replaced, since information on the internet, are sometimes biased. Generally, media are funded by governments and parties, which are following their political agendas. Therefore, one could not trust the contradicted information about a place, unless travels there. More importantly, not all the details could be transmitted through the internet. When people travel, they have an opportunity to talk to residents of a new place, observe their behaviors, and eat their foods. None of this first-handed information accessible through the web. Finally, while pictures of great monuments or museums are widely available on the internet, they are still the main attractions for tourists, when they are visiting a new city or country.
Admittedly, the Internet instead of traveling would be a practical method; Not only it saves time since traveling is time-consuming and workforces have only limited vacation time, but also it is helpful from the financial perspective, with all the high-cost of traveling. However, it seems simplistic to consider the idea that some pictures and articles, could replace the experience of being in the new place.
In conclusion, while the benefits of the internet to gather information about a new culture and place, is undeniable, it could not replace the traveling, as the first-handed source of information. It is due to the fact that media are biased, and cultural aspects of traveling are not transmittable.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- Nowadays larger distances are traveled by people to work and study on a daily basis Some consider it to be a negative development while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
- The trend of increasing tourism causes environmental problems in many parts of the world. What are the main causes of pollution it creates? What can be done to reduce it? 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services Discuss both 87
Comments
The Internet provides us…
The Internet provides us with information about the life and cultures of different countries, and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them.?To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The advent of the Internet has changed the people's lives and it is often argued by many that travelling to other nations due to getting familiar to their customs, cultures and so on is not necessary when it can be done efficiently by searching through the Internet. However, I completely disagree with the statement, from an overall perspective, there is a wide variety of reasons why I believe that travelling is essential to know about the cultures of other countries.
The primary argument in favour of this idea is that it helps to clear our misconceptions about other cultures. To specifically, a nation has a different variety of precious customs that can be distinguished from other counties. If individuals tend to get a piece of knowledge about a community, they should visit it, not only does the internet provide these facilities but also, they should spend a period of time there. writing their perceptions and attitudes about that nation, the authors' writing can not be an appeal to others. Take the Chinese behaviour as an example, the reporter broadcast the disgusting and awkward behaviour on the BBC news, while most people, interacted with Chinese, mentioned a positive perspective.
Another argument in support of travelling is that it helps people to enjoy by doing new things. Whereas numerous are susceptible to the internet's information about other societies, it probably would not be replaced as a trip. Because the internet is unable to provide a majority of activities such as tasting traditional food or wearing a costume as a reality. therefore, presenting at a specific place is essential to experience fun. For instance, there is an array of colorful sari in India to wear that people can feel the excitement. The more clothes the tourists wear, the more they feel happy.
In conclusion, there is commonly argued that the internet brings advantages for people to gain lots of information about other communities, while it seems to me that experiencing the excitement and being away of misconception owing to a nation requires presenting in the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 777, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey are visiting a new city or country. Admittedly, the Internet instead of trav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37677053824 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98691327696 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549575070822 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6276077629 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.647058824 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359796179202 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119569429796 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178126486308 0.0667982634062 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264379781084 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.343520735474 0.056905535591 604% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.