A lot of information can be inferred from the internet related to countries around the world. These interpretations can provide us with insights into people's lifestyle and cultural background from other countries. A number of people subscribe to the belief that it is not imperative to know or visit these nations. I, completely, disagree with the given assertion owing to a multitude of compelling reasons.
Admittedly, the internet is one of the cornerstones of a flourishing nation from the social perspective thereby having a great deal impact on effective communication. Simply put, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of socialization, it is believed the internet is of rewarding information about people living a far distance away and make a corridor to convey the information about their culture and way of life. Transferring other nations' information not only help people to create a virtual imagination about other society but also encourage them to take a holiday to travel in such areas. It seems quite tenable that, individuals acquainted with a foreigner's customs, bound to appear sufficient and effective communication. For instance, if one accidentally face a tourist in their own homeland, such person is more highly likely to connect on the basis of the tourist's code of conduct.
In addition to this, personal benefits should be taken into consideration when it comes to visiting or knowing new places via the internet. To put it differently, the vast majority of people are on the tight budget to afford an abroad trip, therefore finding a far-reaching way to visit other countries in the lowest price throughout the internet. The more people are susceptible to information about one's traditional costume and lifestyle living in another society, the more people might expand their horizon which leads to changing their attitude towards the world. Take a person surfs the internet to get familiar with another nation with various culture and difference lifestyle for example; such individual can take part in all relevant subjects and even the pressing matters related to the certain country as a direct result of his research. Moreover, it can go beyond horizon considerations. knowing and visiting other states are highly likely to make spiritual enrichment as a person can increase their self-confidence by their experience.
To conclude, it is my firm conviction that the tremendous benefits accruing from the internet to people because of the information conveying about other cultural backgrounds and lifestyles are by no means negligible. This is mainly because people can find an opportunity to broaden their vision and to make the effective communication.
- Some people claim that not enough of wastes from homes is recycled. They say that that only way to increase recycling for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
- Many elderly peopleare no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 78
- 78
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions in this? 78
- Some physiologist recommented that it is important to overcome stress by spending time do nothing To what extend do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ure and way of life. Transferring other nations information not only help people to cre...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 900, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Knowing
...t can go beyond horizon considerations. knowing and visiting other states are highly li...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08809824845 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540094339623 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9992502837 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.058823529 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9411764706 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267671018322 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083197557015 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620889974793 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174013006807 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440630367451 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.