It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
Whether animal species to become extinct ignites a heated debate. Some people claim that natural processes exert detrimental impacts on the living of animals and wreak havoc on their health. Nevertheless, others cling to that humans are the main reason cripple animals. I partly advocate this opinion for the following grounds.
On the one hand, natural section evolution takes tolls on animals. Notwithstanding that genetic structures are not appropriate, evolution development can put the life of the animal in jeopardy, even removed them from the world. It is an indisputable fact that global warming and climate change put rare animals on the verge of collapse. By dint of the ice melting, the sea level rises to wipe out habitats of some species. On account of chief among causes of global warming are human activities, humans must be to blame for animal destruction. It is obvious that agricultural activities like the use of pesticides or fertilizers are the culprit of death in animals increase. It is undeniable that a number of people's rampant poaching and trafficking put species in peril.
Therefore, humans must try to find as many solutions as possible. Heavy punishment for illegal hunters not only does minimizing wildlife crime but can be controlled seduced into social evils. Humans must restore habitats like zoos, sanctuaries to take care of neglected animals. Each people should boost and change awareness.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that nature just plays a small role, while humans are the primary contributes to animals' disappearance. Therefore, humans should join hands to preserve animals as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | studywithlove | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether animal species to become extinct ignite...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27924528302 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82675514996 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637735849057 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6194371757 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2941176471 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52941176471 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201766328534 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598212721765 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439528032926 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1211676326 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638899368653 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.