Junk/Street Food is the most affordable meal for the working class. But health problems due to rampant and uncontrolled consumption are being compounded.
It has therefore become imperative for governments to impose a higher tax on them.
To what extent do you agree to this arrangement by the government?
Give your opinion.
Governments devise to implement high taxes on junk food due to its massive consumption by the public, which causes several. I concur with the given thought. This essay shall delineate the key factors such as expensive street food and financial assistance that would help nations to cope with the problem in an efficient manner.
People would not prefer to have fast foods due to dishes' higher prices after the increment of tax rates on such dishes. Individuals' affordabilities on these items would dwindle, which would compel them to stop thinking of having junk food. Thus, consumption of healthy food would proliferate, which offers several crucial nutrients that are the building blocks of a body. Consequently, public would be able to stay fit and dwell a healthy lifestyle. For instance, the marginalized section and middle-class workers of the developing territories have green vegetable cuisines over other fast foods as governments inaugrated rise in taxes on street dishes.
Furtermore, buying high-taxed junk food would contribute towards the economic stability of countries. Since enormous individuals would prevent themselves to have an unhealthy food, there would be many who would still have such food due to their love and preference for such cuisines. Moreover, affluent people might minimize their spending on junk food but would still have it to fulfil their craving. As a result, governments would receive exorbitant money because of the higher taxes on street food that would ameliorate nations' financial conditions. To illustrate, juveniles love to explore and taste different street foods, irrespective of their costs, which in return accomodates the administrations with massive tax amount.
In conclusion, fast food could cause severe health challenges for the public because of its unhealthy aspects. Therefore, executing higher taxes on such dishes is vital as it would be helpful for countries and their people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 67 | view |
- As global trade increases between different countries many daily necessities are produced in other countries Such goods are usually transported a long distance Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks 73
- Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Junk Street Food is the most affordable meal for the working class But health problems due to rampant and uncontrolled consumption are being compounded It has therefore become imperative for governments to impose a higher tax on them To what extent do you 67
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 67
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d help nations to cope with the problem in an efficient manner. People would not prefer to have fas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47176079734 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82599103282 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9753366739 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223244373012 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853313835082 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449964488173 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156842066367 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173149134321 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.