Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.
What problems does it cause?
What could be done to encourage people to buy local products?
Two days ago, I read an article about the influence of big enterprises on the local market. The author stated that corporations widely use both promotion and advertisement to alter public preferences in shopping. This essay will consider the problems of this change and suggest solutions to stimulate people to purchase domestic goods.
The first problem is the pressure on domestic companies. When a corporation opens its branches in the region, many individual entrepeneurs start to suffer from the unequal competition with it since they have insufficient finding either to introduce themselves in the media nor hold any promotions. Another problem with the entry of corporations in the area is growing prices. Once the dominance in the market is reached by various advertising campaigns, large businesses tend to gradually increase the prices for their products. The last problem is a narrow range of products available. As soon as corporations prevail in the market, they hinder the entry of other companies into the market. As a result, people can neither enjoy other high-quality products devised by other companies nor do shopping at a lower price.
A possible solution to arouse public interest in buying local products is for the government to introduce them to the market. Generally, it is hardly possible to find the information about domestic producers on TV and radio, since they do not have as much budget for advertisement as corporations. Despite this, if the government supported them by freely allocating a time to advertise local products on the state channels, they would have the opportunity to present their local products to the public. Consequently, domestic manufacturers would be familiar to society and, therefore, be able to compete with large businesses. Furthermore, the state could both subsidize local manufacturers and exempt them from some taxes, so they would be able to lower their prices and expand their production.
In conclusion, even though large companies pose many problems to the local market, the government could raise public awareness of local products by showing their local products in the media and assist internal manufacturers financially.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Aman.Kansal1234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | ochirvaani | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | Glenn20sal | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Tolik | 78 | view |
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 89
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Can brain damage from drugs be reversed? 84
- There is an increasing trend around the world to have a small family rather than a large family What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having a small family rather than a large family 84
- Some people say that parents have the most important role in a child's development. However, others argue that other things like television or friends have the most significant influence. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nies nor do shopping at a lower price. A possible solution to arouse public int...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37971014493 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98593496303 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542028985507 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7850558433 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280272588326 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833861628253 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04829337668 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159608489953 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336883849235 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.