Libraries should be shut down as better alternatives are available. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often thought that nowadays libraries could be completely replaced with other better options such as the internet and electronic gadgets. However, I strongly disagree with this notion because libraries serve as a great place of information and knowledge for a larger section of society.
To embark on, libraries act as a huge source of information. These have an enormous collection of books, journals, magazines and other rare materials that might not be accessed online. These institutions have arranged all sorts of information in a systematic way in order to make it convenient for everybody to access this easily and quickly. For instance, my university library has four floors and each floor is exclusive for a particular type of study material such as textbooks ad journals on the first floor, magazines and newspapers on second, literature and computer section on third and office on fourth. Thus, everything is available under one roof.
Another reason to keep libraries alive is that these provide a quiet and comfortable environment for reading which may not be possible to arrange in other methods. Proper seating arrangement, lighting facilities, and noise-free conditions aid readers to concentrate fully on their studies. That’s why it is the best place to study for students, professors as well as people who are unable to find desirable reading situations at their homes or workplaces. Moreover, one another benefit is that most of the libraries allow free access to the paid websites which are mostly related to the latest research findings, research articles and papers. Sometimes, it is not possible for an individual to subscribe to these costly webpages on his/her own.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that the modern world has a lot of alternatives available to access print media, but the role of libraries is still very vital and cannot be substituted with other prevalent methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | kaka singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kaka singh | 89 | view |
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
- Food travels thousand miles from farm to consumers. Some people believe we should buy foods from local farmer to protect environment and support local business. Do the advantages outweigh disadadvantages? 89
- Libraries should be shut down as better alternatives are available To what extent do you agree or disagree 98
- Some people consider price as most important thing to think about when buying product( such as cellphone) or service (e,g medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree? 67
- In some cities and towns over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... have arranged all sorts of information in a systematic way in order to make it convenient for ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, second, so, still, third, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30844155844 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89142654148 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3096024462 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108442711572 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372895069402 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376466567846 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759592831793 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361768653405 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.