Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
Today’s economic development, a so called, a rat race game has its own pros and cons. Every development requires shift of scare resources from one use to another. Likewise, economic development has led to shift from human efforts more towards development activities being personal, educational, technical development or societal development in terms of culture, linguistics or on moral grounds. Unfortunately, among various forms of developments, economic development has outweigh the social values. Living in this material world, I agree to the fact the economic development has more merits in its favor than demerits.
At First, we can reiterate that change is law of nature. Nothing is or should be rigid in this world. Even still water is not boon to the human kind. Economic development is a form of change in various aspects of society. Its includes personal, education, monetary and many more. In contrast, it is also truth that we have not seen significant positive change in the social values. In this material world, quantitative benefits has vital importance than the qualitative and so is our social values. People with good eye for fashion does not look for body revealing appeal of the cloths rather than focus on new trends, good looking and luxurious style of cloth. It can be considered as bad fortune of the society but we cannot neglect the personal benefits achieved by the society out of this economic development.
Further, in addition to countless personal benefits, countries are getting lot of money which is getting utilized for developing infrastructure, medical facilities. Today life expectancy has grown very high in comparison to previous era. Although, we need to give due weightage to social values but when the situation comes to choosing among both, people rather go for economic development.
To conclude, economic development is necessity for human kind to live in comparison to social value which gives inner satisfaction to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | pawanchopra000 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | monana_na | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | kajal123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | Anand_DD | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | gsw.singh@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people blame the government for the increase in childhood obesity while others think it is the parents’ fault. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 92
- Should governments make decisions about people’s lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions? 78
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree?Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactiv 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... developments, economic development has outweigh the social values. Living in this mater...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, look, so, still, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30158730159 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96121566015 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0999547409 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7777777778 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239975633907 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712233787972 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646635480487 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157258971713 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528749690761 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.