In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in
their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from
other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the
disadvantages?
The idea of eating a wide variety of food grown in other areas is in people's mind. As a consequence, people would like to eat food produced in other nations rather than local food. Although there are some drawbacks of this trend, i would argue that there are some more benefits.
On the one hand, this trend will provide a diverse number of products for local countries. In fact, people could buy a lot of foods which are not produced in their country or are as not good as other countries. as a result, people will enjoy better quality of life. For example, In Viet Nam, a wide range of fruits are imported from foreign countries especially in Europe such as: Germany, France, therefore they will have more choices in purchasing fruits with high quality and high satisfaction. In addition, with exchanging products among regions will help the economic development. Because this trend indeed increases the economic output and relationships among nations to motivate exportation. For instance, rice in Viet Nam are exported to Europe leads to Viet Nam ranks number 2 in rice exporting in the world, so the economic in Viet Nam is on significant growth.
On the other hand, foods are imported from other countries are as not fresh as local country due to this foods have to be transported in a long time with long distance. As a result, the fruits might get rotten and other foods go off, it is a negative effects for local's finance. Besides, the food of a region reflects its customs and cultures, if people continue importing a lot of foods from other regions, some local special food may diminish which would be loss of food culture.
In conclusion, I belive that eating more foods from other regions than local foods brings a lot of benefits, but the disadvantages of this trend should be taken into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...there are some drawbacks of this trend, i would argue that there are some more be...
^
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... or are as not good as other countries. as a result, people will enjoy better qual...
^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...re as not fresh as local country due to this foods have to be transported in a long ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ects its customs and cultures, if people continue importing a lot of foods from ...
^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople continue importing a lot of foods from other regions, some local special f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75949367089 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58324783246 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503164556962 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6774514122 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280496092741 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115076405398 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104096934657 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206490596697 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868621600326 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.