Every country has some billionaires who earn a staggering amount of money. While some opine, it is beneficial for a county, others demand governmental intervention to limit the renumeration people can earn. However, I disfavored such irrational paradigm, and people should be free to make money according to their skills and abilities.
On the one hand, it is thought that a few wealthy people of a country can transfigure common people 's lives by investing smartly. Because renowned business tycoons or entrepreneurs are the individuals who earn exorbitant amount of salaries compare to wages a common man. These people, being business minded, can obviously endeavor for the walfare of local people, and they can also earn by their services. For instance, launching of Jio, a mobile network, by one of the wealthiest persons of India - Mr. Mukesh Ambani. Services of Jio are way cost-effective in terms of SMS, VOICE, and Internet packs. I short, it can be argued it was Mr. Ambani who brought digital revolution in India. Such services were extremely pricey in the past, but Mr. Ambani invested billions of dollars for this feat and now earning even more.
A growing number of people, on the other hand, opine that government ought to take control of the wages people earn in different fields. They believe that by setting a certain limit in the pay an enormous amount of money can be saved which will be deposited in exchequer, and can be used for people in destination, unemployment and unpreviledged. To illustrate the point, most of doctors earn average ₹1 Lac, and ₹50000 is enough to suffice all basic needs, also they can enjoy many luxurious in ₹50000 monthly income. If government spends remaining ₹5000 to help augment salaries of people who work hard yet they earn less than they deserve. Such as, a farmer in an impecunious situation.
I am of the opinion that, people should be free to earn as per their expertise, knowledge and capacities. Imposing any form of restrictions on earnings would be unfair and that may result into discrimination and many haphazards. Salary limitations, therefore, would be an inappropriate initiative.
In conclusion, some people favor progress of some people, who earn uncomparatively high salaries, because they can contribute in country's welfare, and others aspire of imposing governmental restrictions in people's earnings as remaining amount can be saved to bridge gap between thw rich and the poor. Nevertheless, I believe, in democratic nation every one is free to work and earn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the doctors') or simply say ''most doctors''.
Suggestion: most of the doctors; most doctors
...unpreviledged. To illustrate the point, most of doctors earn average ₹1 Lac, and ₹50000 is enou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n countrys welfare, and others aspire of imposing governmental restrictions in pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13221153846 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94523466583 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560096153846 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.501628416 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229076703958 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687913076149 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050418373862 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139520230409 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283005382818 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.