In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.
What do you think are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
In Kazakhstan, the awareness of events plays an important role in making daily decisions. However, some social workers claim that a small number of people are interested in keeping track of news through newspapers or TV. In this essay, I will consider the reasons for this low interest in the community and suggest some possible steps to deal with it.
Let us start with the reasons why these types of media have a tiny audience. The first reason is that people are inclined to monitor the news online. Many people prefer to learn about public affairs on the Internet, since it allows them to access news immediately, which newspapers and TV programs usually cannot offer. Another cause is that people tend to be suspicious of news presented on newspapers and TV channels. Most people distrust information on newspapers as well as TV, because they tend to provide false information to attract more attention.
Nevertheless, some editors state that it is possible to handle this problem by taking the following actions. Firstly, they advise to publish issues more frequently. The way forward would be for both newspaper and TV companies to produce their news more often, so that they could compete with rivals in the web. Secondly, they recommend to introduce a law against distorted information. To address this problem, the government should impose regulations against misleading information, so that newspapers and TV channels would stop generating unreliable news.
In conclusion, although there are many reasons contributing to the low interest in following news on newspapers and TV, I think that it is probable to solve this complication by adopting the above mentioned measures.
- These days people are living into their 90s and beyond As a result there is increasing concern about care for the elderly Do you think it is the responsibility of the family to care for their elderly members or should the government be held responsible 96
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.To what extent do you agree? 73
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 73
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for latest technological developments How far do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...However, some social workers claim that a small number of people are interested in keeping track ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'publishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: publishing
...following actions. Firstly, they advise to publish issues more frequently. The way forward...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend introducing'.
Suggestion: recommend introducing
... with rivals in the web. Secondly, they recommend to introduce a law against distorted information. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80213316021 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2285921927 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235606483137 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776491660748 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608099719436 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146760143505 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373307300499 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.