In earlier times, people relied on newspapers or televisions for news or to gather information about happenings around the world. However, the trend to follow newspaper or TV is decreasing in most of the societies. This is due to a change in lifestyle and availability of alternate sources of news at disposal which are cheaper and convenient. In this essay, various factors causing the change in trend and the actions needed, if any, to reverse it will be discussed.
For example, newspapers are not convenient to carry every time and could be read when the reader is sitting at one place either at an office desk or in the home, though some people carry them while travelling too. But now we have alternate options like e-papers on websites, which can be read on desktop, laptop or mobile browsers; they are more preferred over conventional paper-based news. Internet-based news not only provides convenience but also saves a great deal of time, as people can read news practically anytime at work or travelling i.e. in between the meetings or while having coffee or during smoking breaks or in a metro.
Also, Television news is great for people having a liberty of time, which is not the case for most of us. Due to a change in lifestyle and increasing work pressure, people often spend more time in the office or travelling which allows them to spend little time at home with family. The value of this time is precious and many prefer to spend this watching family programs than news. Compared to television based news, the mobile-based news application like 'Inshorts' or 'Newshunt' filter out the news based on reader's interest and provide the essence of an hour-long primetime news show on television, in very limited words saving time for the reader.
To conclude, changes in lifestyle and availability of alternate and more convenient news sources, the popularity of newspaper or television based news are diminishing. However, so far consumers are able to receive news what they seek, the medium of news is truly immaterial. And I personally don't see any merit to promote some mode of news over others.
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would be better if more good news was reported? 73
- You are studying for qualification and you would like some time off work to complete it.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter-ask for sometime of the computer qualification-just what you Will do later at work if you have time or-say how the quali 84
- Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both places? 73
- Some people choose to eat no fish or meat. They believe that this is not better for your own health but also benefits the world as whole. Discuss these view and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s is truly immaterial. And I personally dont see any merit to promote some mode of n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91899441341 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72598937463 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533519553073 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9896607164 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.785714286 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191611461536 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732081464986 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302522661448 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122196106801 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168315690095 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.