Many parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having large number of toys?
For every grown-up, playing with toys is one of the most unforgettable memories in there early childhood. Many parents purchase playthings a lot for their sons or daughters. Is it positive or negative? Before drawing upon a clear conclusion, this essay will analyze both benefits and drawbacks.
First of all, toys play an important role in a child’s development. Those little and simple things enable children to think of a wonderful world or talk to animal toys as friends; therefore enhancing creativity and imagination. For instance, parents usually give their daughters beautiful dolls, the girls can make up an imaginary families with those dolls. Moreover, some toys are designed not only for recreation but for boosting offspring’s intelligence as well, such as building blocks, musical instruments, Rurik cubes or puzzles. If parents purchase these educational toys for their young ones, they will have better cognitive skills, motor skills and solving problems skills. For infants who enjoy playing puzzles or math toys, they are able to read, count or draw earlier than their peers and tend to get better achievements at school. In addition colourful and diverse-shaped playthings are extremely beneficial for a kid’s visuality. It is also believed that sharing toys together can help children have better relationships as well as they will learn to give good things to less fortunate ones.
On the other hand, there are several certain disadvantages. Adults spoiling many of toys on their sons or daughters leads to a bad effect on children’s personalities. In particular, those offsprings may think being offered a lot of toys is certain and claim for everything they see in supermarkets or from other friends. In other words, young boys and girls can learn to appreciate what they have if they own less playthings. Besides, spending too much time playing blocks or teddy bears discourages children to go outside and play physical activities. Football, doing exercise or traditional games support the young’s health and activeness. Furthermore, a potential danger of playing toys is its insecurity. Nowadays, many plastic things such as dolls, fruits toys or robots contain contaminated chemicals that can seriously affect babies’ health if they suck it.
As we have seen, purchasing toys for children is more important and difficult than it seems. For children’s complete development and personalities, mothers and fathers have to make informed decision about how many and what toys to buy and also how much time children are allowed to spend with their toys.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'family'?
Suggestion: family
...lls, the girls can make up an imaginary families with those dolls. Moreover, some toys a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...o get better achievements at school. In addition colourful and diverse-shaped playthings...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun playthings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o appreciate what they have if they own less playthings. Besides, spending too much ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much time playing blocks or teddy bears discourages children to go outside and p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in particular, such as, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39268292683 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02268244465 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592682926829 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0925815306 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333648984144 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946571518569 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656639334985 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221176040586 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458689422931 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.