Globalization has casued countries to share inventories, not least of eatables, leading to an ever connected world. However, a voice against this trend is being raised by a certain section of the society. I align myself with the status quo, and will present the reasonings, for the same, in the forthcoming passages.
The fact that only certain types of vegetation can be grown in certain areas, is the first reason. Different plantation requires different environmental conditions: soil, air and topology, which are not the same, everywhere. Therefore, postulating all the food should be grown in the same country, without import, is flawed. India, a country which does not have a suitable climate for growing apples, speaks volumes to illustrate this argument as it imports the fruit from Canada, without which, there would be no apples to consume.
Secondly, the negative impact this new proposition has on countries' foreign relations should be considered. Owing to the fact that healthy bonds, in countries, are made with healthy trade, inhibiting it, could break them, leading to a country's solitary status in the world; consequently, this could not only weaken the relations but also promote hostility among them. South Sudan, a country with little to no trade pacts with neighbouring countries, is contantly on the radar, for negative reasons, due to the distance it maintans.
In conclusion, the voices of those who support anti-trade regulations should not be considered as there are eminent risks and issues associated with it: bitter foreign relations and unavalibilty of certain vegetation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37944664032 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86413209674 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4475405412 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112968398684 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442605909766 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502004981807 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592094632519 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316778573887 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.