Undoubtedly, the use of social media has been increasing tremendously for last few years. A part of society thinks that these social networking sites, for example, Facebook, have had influenced people and community in a negative way. I entirely agree with this notion because it has detrimental effects on one's personality and mental health and the societies lack empathy owing to its excessive use.
Presently, most of adults are seen busy with their mobile phones and computers using the social sites online, communicating with people who are entirely unknown to them. Since most of the times they have not met them in person, the chances of getting cheated are high. For instance, a news caught huge atttention few months ago of a girl who was decieived by her so-called friend on Facebook who cleverly took the information regarding her bank accounts and withdrew all the money. People had witnessed such incidents in the past too therefore, its not wise to blindly trust someone whom you do not know.
In addition to this, spending increased time in front of screens has increased the incidence of both mental and physical ailments. Individuals are being seen by physicians having eye problems and psychological issues due to depending on their friends of social media who are not there in person to console them when they are in distress. The number of people having mental issues has been rising alarmingly for past few years.
Furthermore, the communities are also not safe from this. Since adults do not give enough time to their family members and neighbours, they lack the emotional bond which exists between loved ones. A society who has no empathy towards others cannot flourish.Hence, the whole community is affected by such an attituude of individuals. For example, a survey told that most people make friends online rather than seeing thier neighbours or relatives because they find using the internet more fascinating. Therefore, it is obvious that such a society whose citizens are not available for each other to celebrate the happiness or mourn over the loss of someone cannot prosper.
To conclude, social networking sites have negative impact on both people and community because it has made them emotionally far away from each other and increased the pace of mental illnesses.
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people believe individuals are more important in taking care of environment, others thinks government should be major responsible to it. Discuss and give your opinion. 61
- some people say that giving aid to poor countries has more negative effects than positive ones To what txtent do you agree or disagree 65
- Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ave had influenced people and community in a negative way. I entirely agree with this notion beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the adults') or simply say ''most adults''.
Suggestion: most of the adults; most adults
...ing to its excessive use. Presently, most of adults are seen busy with their mobile phones ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
... empathy towards others cannot flourish.Hence, the whole community is affected by suc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1164021164 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67158570411 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0116263352 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205530980518 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622873070097 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706710746014 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124937222882 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648056011887 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.