Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past few years social media websites and apps such as Facebook and Twitter have become hugely popular with the youth. While using these sites has many benefits such as being efficient and enjoyable, they also have a few drawbacks which overall makes this development a bad one.
Using apps like Facebook and Twitter are a convenient and fun way to talk with friends and family members. Instead of phoning someone and hoping they aren’t busy, sending messages through these apps can be a better option as the person can receive the notification when they are free and respond in a timely manner. Also, most people are very busy these days so often can’t answer their phone or meet friends for a coffee or face to face chat. By using Twitter and similar sites, we can still keep in touch with our friends often even if they are far away. These sites are often enjoyable to use as well. In addition to chatting, we can send pictures, videos and funny messages to our friend, which strengthen friendship bonds and thus lead to better relationships.
However, there are negative aspects of using social sites as the main way to communicate and I believe these far outweigh the benefits mentioned above. First, if we only chat using these sites we can lose our ability to interact well with others face to face. This can cause people to feel depressed, lonely and have mental issues as human are inherently social creatures who need more interaction than social media sites provide. Furthermore, the type of interaction is not intimate. When we meet face-to-face, we can really feel the emotions of others and can connect strongly resulting in far stronger relationships. However, via social media the interaction is far colder and can result in artificial relationships. For instance, many people have 500 plus Facebook friends but they don’t actually know these people well or ever meet them for a coffee or meal. Thus, these types of friends and interactions are not sufficient and surely not a adequate replacement for face to face meetings.
To close, while there are some benefits of social sites such as being convenient and fun to use, we should not ignore the drawback discussed above. I recommend that people make sure to communicate with their loved ones via the phone and in person not only via social media sites like Facebook.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | harleenkaur86p | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...tead of phoning someone and hoping they arent busy sending messages through these app...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...fication when they are free and respond in a timely manner Also most people are very busy these da...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eople are very busy these days so often cant answer their phone or meet friends for ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...have 500 plus Facebook friends but they dont actually know these people well or ever...
^^^^
Line 3, column 927, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tions are not sufficient and surely not a adequate replacement for face to face m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74812967581 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4003578691 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478802992519 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 401.0 20.2975951904 1976% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1904.0 106.682146367 1785% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 401.0 20.7667163134 1931% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 132.0 7.06120827912 1869% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148004587546 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148004587546 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112846421845 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461416334608 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 201.4 13.0946893788 1538% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -327.08 50.2224549098 -651% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 158.5 11.3001002004 1403% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.75 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.68 8.58950901804 311% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 9.78957915832 541% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 162.4 10.1190380762 1605% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 159.0 10.7795591182 1475% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.