many people believe that social networking such as facebook have had a huge negetive impact on both individuals and society. to what extent do you agree.
Social networking sites for instance facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental affect on individual people as well as society and local communities. However, in my opinion, while i believe that such sites are mainly beneficial to the individual, I agree that they have had a damaging effect on local communities.
With regards to individuals, the impact that online social media has had on each individual person has clear advantages. Firstly, people from different countries are brought together through such sites as facebook whereas before development of technology and social networking sites, people rarely had the chance to meet or communicate with anyone outside of their immediate circle or community. Secondly, facebook also has special groups which offers individuals a chance to meet and participate in discussions with people who share common interests.
On the other hand, the effect that facebook and other social networking sites have had on societies and local communities can only be seen as negative. Rather than individual people taking part in their local community, they are instead choosing to take more interest in people online. Consequently, the people within local communities are no longer forming close or supportive relationships. Furthermore, society as a whole is becoming increasingly disjoined and fragmented as people spend more time online with people they have never met face to face and who they are unlikely to ever meet in future.
To conclude, although social networking sites have brought individuals closer together, they have not had the same effect on societies or local communities. Local communities should do more to try and involve local people in local activities in order to promote the future of community life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-06-15 | sanakhalid1234 | 73 | view |
2017-06-15 | sanakhalid1234 | 73 | view |
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it what are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 70
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Television dominates the free-time for too many people. It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others. Do you agree or disagree?Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Wri 11
- The tendency for human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashions in clothes and other consumers goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ought by some to have had a detrimental affect on individual people as well as society an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...munities. However, in my opinion, while i believe that such sites are mainly bene...
^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... and who they are unlikely to ever meet in future. To conclude, although social networ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...es. Local communities should do more to try and involve local people in local activitie...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40143369176 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88001251123 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1610501133 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9090909091 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272101632731 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11754352977 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574277090875 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183074008634 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353266228824 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.