Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Technology has rapidly increased in today's world. Due to more inventions in the technology, people have started depending on alternative ways of communication which have reduced the necessity of writing letters to communicate. To a large extent, I agree with the following statement which would be briefly explained in my further essay.
Firstly, globalisation has increased in fast-pace which has led people to explore more around the world. Infact, the community has started expecting to want to know about the daily whereabouts of what is happening in the other parts of the world. To obtain this information immediately, a plethora of modern communication media have sprung for instance mass media, social media and mobile phone applications. For example, if a person is staying in India and would want to know the whereabouts of his/her family abroad, he would use a mobile phone application like Whatsapp or Facetime to get in touch with them at that particular moment. This would save their time as well.
Secondly, although writing letters has been an old traditional method, it has affected the environment in a negative way. To write a letter, the sender has to use paper as a resource which was produced by cutting down of the trees and harming our environment. Since the growth in modern communications has lessened the use of papers due to which many blocks of wood have been saved and there is no loss of habitat of the wild. To state an example, during the olden times, the community used telegram or posted letters to communicate with someone. However, the resources used was derived from chopping down the greeneries around because of which led to an increase in the carbon footprint, in turn, was harming the ecosystem.
In conclusion, the growth in modern ways of communication has helped society to look forward to a better future while saving on time, energy and lowering the use of natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-09 | mehjabin | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | lakhveer khokhar | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | manu_kaur113 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | shain | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | thaskeen123 | 67 | view |
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant In the letter explain why you were at the restaurant describe the problems write about the 81
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media Should they be given more privacy or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- You recently attended a conference and you would like to give a presentation about the information you gained by attending the conference Write a letter to your manager asking for permission to give a presentation In your letter describe what type of pres 78
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant In the letter explain why you were at the restaurant describe the problems write about the 89
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media Should they be given more privacy or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...method, it has affected the environment in a negative way. To write a letter, the sender has to u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84824507373 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565625 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3854530351 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137897283276 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456811581189 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288506526775 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786511597592 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241598458105 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.