In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animal as food or to use animal products for example clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animal as food or to use animal products, for example, clothing and medicines.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this day and age, it is believed that there are more alternatives to animal-based products for people to serve their lives. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view on account of several reasons below.
First, I am convinced that people can live on fruits and vegetables without slaughtering animals for meat. According to medical experts, a plant-based diet can supply as sufficient nutrients for long-term health benefits as an animal-based diet can do. Eating nutrient-dense whole foods like fruits, vegetables, and whole grains compensate for potential deficiencies caused by cutting meat. The low amount of fat and the antioxidant substance in plant foods mitigate the risks of several diseases such as obesity, stroke, or heart attack. For this reason, people can maintain their health and expand their longevity, although they reduce animal protein intakes.
Second, I argue that medical experiments on animals and clothes manufactured from animals’ body parts should also be widely discouraged. In fact, there is no need to cause pain and suffering to animals when sophisticated computer systems, mathematical models, human tissue and cell cultures and more focused clinical studies can also show us what happens to our bodies during disease. Besides that, some natural plants such as ginger and ginseng can be used in curing illnesses instead of medicine to partly reduce unnecessary experiments on animals. In terms of clothing, manufacturers can replace fur or limbs by artificial materials and synthesized fabric to produce fashionable items. This helps to reassure the development of the fashion industry without violating animal rights.
In conclusion, people do not kill or harm other animal species to meet their needs. Instead, they can exploit the modern advances of technology, artificial materials and plant-based foods as alternatives for their lives to lessen the suffering of animals.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-24 Hanachan123456789 84 view
Essays by user Hanachan123456789 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47811447811 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91502776796 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646464646465 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4280666299 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.214285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224958136184 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724049641358 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03536410411 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12840604459 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159826448431 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.