In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people
via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive
or negative development in your opinion?
There is no doubt that the constant advancement of technology has exerted an influence on human beings’ development and manufacturing process. In modern day, individuals are capable of getting access to a number of top-notch devices that allow us to purchase, work or contact with others regardless of direct interaction. In spite of its available good impacts, there are a variety of detrimental effects that I will discuss in the following essay.
First and foremost, customers can purchase online in terms of apps including facebook, tiki, shoppee, and so on with the aim of saving time and petrol. Secondly, by designing learning and working virtual platforms, this effective strategy assists citizens to protect them from rapidly Covid-19 spreading in society. Finally, the more feverishly the growth of technology is, the more beneficial those nations get. For example, thanks to the Internet, ethnic minority groups in Vietnam will be able to access a wide range of necessary information sources. They therefore are capable of developing their education system and improving living conditions by themselves. Actually, the advancement of the digital age creates a number of opportunities for those seeking a convenient and simple life.
Beside being beneficial for those that I have mentioned in the previous paragraph, this development is also detrimental in other ways. It is clearly evident that Internet users easily get virtual friendships by means of social media. However, it may be not genuine and lead to social deterioration such as human trafficking, paedophiles, or sexual harrassment. On the other hand, most employers seem to be overdependent on the Internet connection quality these days. Unfortunately, it exerts a big adverse influence on their working consequences if they are under the pressure which is related to the bad connection. In the long run, there is a growing propensity that a number of young people may lead their entire lonely life in a small room but not community due to the fact that they just communicate with others through the computer or smartphones’ screen.
To recapitulate, the internet-connected devices solve multiple problems associated with long-distance communication and work. Although it brings out such wonderful advantages to the public, young generations or internet users should pay attention to their drawbacks to forestall unexpected situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | Lê Huỳnh Mai | 89 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction quality these days. Unfortunately, it exerts a big adverse influence on the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, no doubt, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49597855228 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15659482349 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627345844504 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.426028005 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169830595332 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464902017565 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474680985848 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102035934319 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209476835773 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction quality these days. Unfortunately, it exerts a big adverse influence on the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, no doubt, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49597855228 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15659482349 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627345844504 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.426028005 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169830595332 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464902017565 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474680985848 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102035934319 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209476835773 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.