Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion?
It is inevitable fact that results from scientific research is revolutionary. Yet the fact that funding for postgraduate research is limited cannot be overlook. Some people argue that financial support should not be given for scientific research & should not be wasted on less useful projects like arts or history. I disagree to this debate since other research fields are also important & certainly add a good value in our life.
To begin with, the value addition of scientific research cannot be denied, these research has revolutionized our lives. The prominent example is the invention of computers that has changed our life altogether. The way we communicate, do business has been newly formalized with the use of computers. Time saving, efficient device that helps us in almost every field of life. Another start example of scientific research is invention of light. In today’s world we cannot imagine to live without electricity which is only possible due to great amount of research done & great inventors of that time.
On the contrary, the importance of other research could not be neglected such as arts & different languages of previous era. By investing time & money in history & arts we have learnt enormous things. Pot making, cutlery making was initiated in ancient times. Also by investing on history research we can learn from our mistakes such as damage done by World War 1 & 2 & how it could be prevented. What war strategies that worked & what failed.
To recapitulate this argument, I completely favor the idea of investing in all sort of research field be it scientific, history or art. They may differ in terms of their value addition but holds importance
- Governments dthe underage children for getting full time jobs in certain countries Is it good thing or bad thing 67
- Developed countries should take more refugees from poorer countries Do you agree or disagree 85
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight. This is a serious problem for wealthy countries. Discuss some causes and effects of this problem.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experi 61
- Some people think that public libraries are not necessary today. Buy some feel that they r still providing some useful services. Discuss both the issues from your opinion. 73
- People find it very difficult to speak in public or to give a presentation before an audience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine living'.
Suggestion: imagine living
... light. In today's world we cannot imagine to live without electricity which is only possi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch done & great inventors of that time. On the contrary, the importance of other...
^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... making was initiated in ancient times. Also by investing on history research we can...
^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir value addition but holds importance
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, sort of, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13503649635 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83908573247 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4496471242 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7647058824 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325207675365 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971490838321 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918302239287 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185612666242 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124550376989 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.