More and more developing countries are expanding their tourist industries. Why is this? Is it a positive development?
The tourism sector today is one of the biggest job creators. The impetus that the growing tourism industry provides to the economy has attracted many developing nations to focus on increasing revenue through this sector. I partially favor this development and this essay will discuss the reasons why the focus of governments has now shifted to the tourism sector followed by its positive and negative effects.
To begin with, the tourism industry in developing nations has long remained in a shambolic state with little or no assistance provided by governments. However, there has been a paradigm shift in this approach and states are now focusing on tourism as a way to generate revenues to fill the coffers. Additionally, the visitors not only bring revenue to the state but also generate employment opportunities for the local population and increase the sales for local traders. There are nations who have for long leveraged the fruits of the healthy tourism sector. For instance, tourism in Switzerland contributes a large chunk to its GDP. Therefore, it is not surprising that governments across developing nations are trying to replicate the success of countries like Switzerland.
However, there should be a fine balance between the growth in tourism and ecology. It should be the prerogative of the governments to help nature flourish between the thriving tourism industry. For instance, The Government in Nepal has taken a multi-million dollar initiate to clear Mt. Everest of trash. While tourist influx brings development and growth to the once neglected region, it takes a toll on the serendipity of the surroundings. A striking example of the perils of unchecked growth of tourists in a fragile landscape is the disaster of Kedarnath. Hence, it becomes far more important to maintain the ecological balance to avert any apocalypse while also creating more opportunities in this sector.
To conclude, I would say that the fig leaf of the tourism industry should not be allowed to spoil the nature. Every government owns the responsibility of catering to the demand of the population while also taking initiatives to save the environment from deterioration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | Bhawna Sharma | 73 | view |
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them However others do not agree Discuss both sides and give your opinion 75
- In many countries, people have health problems because they choose to live in unhealthy ways. What do you think the reasons for this and how can it be solved? 84
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion about this? 73
- You have organised to go on holiday with your friend. However, you must change your plans.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:1.tell them how much you are looking forward to the holiday2.explain why you must change your plans3.suggest alternativ 87
- Around the world it is likely that more adults will work from home and more children will study from home as computer technology becomes cheaper and more accessible Do you think it is a negative or a positive development 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9644052376 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8968822038 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.882352941 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175913459844 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496007721549 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639891522601 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959576076128 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652281216417 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.