Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to choose an employee or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
Interviews play a vital role in selecting the right candidate for employment. However, nowadays, employers have chosen other alternatives to select a better candidate for the jobs. Certainly, I firmly withstand the other alternative methods in choosing well-experienced employees. In this essay, I will discuss the other methods of hiring people in a company and share my best view in selecting skillful applicants for vacant positions in a company.
Apparently, companies have made a human resources department for selecting the right kind of candidates for the vacant roles in their firm. These human resources workers have several methods to find a better-skilled or experienced employee for the opening positions in their firms. The first and foremost is to sort out the resume of the applicants who have applied for vacant positions in a company. After sorting, the best-skilled ones get evaluated through an aptitude test, reasoning abilities, and technical proficiency test. Every firm has set up its own percentage criteria to pass the test to go on the next round of the interview process. Therefore, applicants have to score outstanding marks with shine colors in the test. With the clearance of the test, employees have to go for the final round of the interview process which is the face-to-face interview round with the employers. The employers select the right candidate for the job role in this final round by evaluating all rounds of the interview process. Consequently, I concur with this kind of practice that has proven convenient and easier ways to find the experienced candidate, especially in the limited time.
However, in a few jobs, it is necessary to have excellent communication skills. Hence, the face-to-face interview round is the only evaluation to evaluate the overall personality. For example, most of the jobs involve direct interaction with clients and as a result, employees need to have strong communication skills. Besides, employers can check the authenticity of the details mentioned in a candidate's CV during interviews.
In conclusion, employers should consider all methods of candidate selection for the vacant position in their companies. Because it will more effective to find a perfect employee for a particular role in the firm.
- You are leaving your job and would like to invite your friend to replace you Write a letter to your friend In your letter you should describe the job explain the reason you are leaving tell him her why you would recommend the job 78
- You are attending a night course in the school You are not happy with some parts of the course Write a letter to the school director about this In your letter you should say which course you are studying what things you are not happy about what you expect 84
- You recently did a short cookery course The cookery school has asked for your feedback on this course Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school In your letter describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you ve done si 78
- Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizen happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You ve just returned from a disastrous holiday It was not as described by the agent and you experienced serious problems Write a letter of complaint to the agent In your letter remind the agent about the holiday explain to them what happened ask for compe 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...Apparently, companies have made a human resources department for selecting the right kind...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a candidate' or simply 'candidates'?
Suggestion: a candidate; candidates
...uthenticity of the details mentioned in a candidates CV during interviews. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, consequently, first, hence, however, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35277777778 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07838817654 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7172534956 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.421052632 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168706534976 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553402385421 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390287930223 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109122760333 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290604710143 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.